Back to articles
Articles

Financial advice for a smaller pension pot: where to turn when help feels out of reach

Robin Powell

Robin Powell

Free guidance and paid advice sound like the same thing. They're not, and knowing which is which can change how much help you get with one of the biggest money decisions you'll ever make.

Free guidance and paid advice sound like the same thing. They're not, and knowing which is which can change how much help you get with one of the biggest money decisions you'll ever make.

The letter has been on the kitchen table for a week now. It came from your pension provider, and it lists your options for taking your money when you retire.

You've read it twice. Maybe three times. And you're still not sure what it's asking you to decide, what some of the words mean, or what happens if you tick the wrong box.

Part of you thinks you should ask someone. But who? Advice has always felt like something for people with more money than you. So the letter sits there. The decision sits with it. And another week goes by.

Why it can feel like no one wants to help

If you've felt that financial advice isn't really meant for someone like you, you're not imagining it. And it isn't a judgement on you or the size of your pension.

Something has shifted in the advice market over the past decade. According to the Schroders UK Financial Adviser Survey, in 2019 about half of advisers said they would take on a new client with less than £50,000 to invest. By 2023 that had fallen to a quarter, and it's stayed at about that level since.

The reason is mostly arithmetic. Many advisers charge a percentage of the money they manage for you. But the work behind good advice, understanding your situation, checking your options, handling the paperwork, costs roughly the same whether your pot is £40,000 or £400,000. On a smaller pot, that percentage doesn't add up to enough to cover the work. So over time, advice has drifted towards people with larger sums.

None of that means your decisions matter less. A pension of £60,000 or £120,000 still has to last you, and it deserves just as much care as a bigger one. The gap is real and well documented. It's nothing you did.

Guidance and advice are different things

So where can you turn? Start with this, because it catches a lot of people out: the free help and the paid help are different things.

Guidance is free and genuinely useful. Pension Wise, a government service for the over-50s, and the wider MoneyHelper service will talk you through your options at retirement and explain how the tax works. What they can't do is tell you which one is right for you. By law, guidance stops short of a personal recommendation. It lays out the map. You still choose the route.

Advice goes a step further. A regulated adviser looks at your circumstances and gives you a personal recommendation, this is what would suit you, and why. That recommendation comes with protection. If advice turns out to be wrong for you, you can complain to the Financial Ombudsman Service, and the Financial Services Compensation Scheme can step in if the firm fails. With guidance, because you made the decision yourself, that recourse isn't there.

Advice isn’t necessarily better than guidance. Both have a place and serve different purposes. Guidance is often where people start. Advice is there for when you want someone to tell you, for your situation, what makes sense.

The routes open to a smaller pot

There are more ways through this than there were five years ago. Some are free, some you pay for, and each asks something different of you.

Free guidance is the natural starting point. Pension Wise and MoneyHelper cost nothing and will leave you clearer about your options.

You can also do it yourself, taking your pension through your existing provider or moving it to an investment platform. Some people are comfortable with that. But the responsibility for getting it right, and the risk if it goes wrong, sits with you. It pays to understand how drawdown works before you rely on it, because a pot can run down faster than you expect.

Then there's regulated advice. The thing that has changed is cost. The all-in cost of advice and investing was around 1.75 per cent of your pot a year, based on 2023 figures from the research firm NextWealth. A newer wave of firms now offers regulated advice built for smaller pots at a lower price. Pense is one of them, advising on pots from £20,000 upwards, with its ongoing advice fee capped at £750 a year.

That cap changes the picture as your pot grows. At half a per cent a year, the fee is £500 on a £100,000 pot. On a £200,000 pot it would be £1,000, but the cap holds it at £750.

Cost matters more when the pot is smaller, because there's less room to absorb it. And the research points to a real benefit, biggest for people with smaller pots. A 2019 study by the International Longevity Centre found they gained a 24 per cent boost to their pension wealth from taking advice, against 11 per cent for wealthier groups.

There's new help arriving, too. A service called targeted support is beginning to reach savers through their own pension providers.

Which of these fits depends entirely on you, your pot, and how much you want to weigh it up alone.

Back to the letter

So, the letter on the kitchen table. It hasn't changed. But you might look at it a little differently now.

You know there are real options behind it, and that they're explained, clearly and for free, by services like Pension Wise. You know guidance will lay out the choices, and that advice will go further and tell you what suits you. You know which one you're asking for when you pick up the phone.

You also know that the feeling which made you hesitate, that advice wasn't for someone with your pot, is fading. It was never really about you.

And perhaps the most important part. A pension of £40,000, or £80,000, or £150,000 is the income you'll live on. It's worth taking seriously. And so are you.

The decision is still yours. It always was. You're just better placed to make it now than you were before.

Robin Powell is a freelance journalist and author, and a financial consumer advocate. He is also the editor of The Evidence-Based Investor.